Saturday, September 11, 2010

The souls of 9/11

Whenever the calendar gets close to 9/11 I find myself thinking about Sara Low, the flight attendant killed in the attacks whose story I did back then. I often wonder how her life might have turned out had fate not dealt her such a horrible blow. I can see her face in my mind as clearly as that of my best friend.

While I arrived in New York City to field produce the 9/11 anniversary two years later, I discovered my hotel room had a chilling view looking directly onto the land that once held the World Trade Center. The night before the anniversary I couldn't sleep, and took a walk down to the site. People were quietly standing around, some with lit candles, some praying, some just staring into the space from which thousands of souls departed. It was quiet, much too quiet for Manhattan, as if some sound barrier kept the city's never ending noise from intruding on the grief of those who were there.

I thought of Sara that night. I thought of her the next morning; when her name was read along with those of the other victims, it was like someone had slugged me in the gut. Firemen had set up a giant bell to be rung that morning. When I was offered the chance to pull the rope and ring it, I thought of Sara as the bell rang and its rich sound echoed off the tall buildings.

And I think of her today. Even though we never met.

It's easy to simply state the number of lives lost on 9/11. And with the potentially explosive events of the past few days, it's easy to turn our attention away from the memories of those who died that day.

But every number represented a life, unique and special in its own way.

I encourage you to take a moment today to pick one soul to remember. Go online and find a photo of one of the victims. Read the story of that person's life. Familiarize yourself with that person's face. Imagine that you've lost a friend.

Then don't forget that person. Take time to remember next year on 9/11.

In a business that spends too much time covering tragedy, it's important to understand the lives behind the numbers. Reporters often talk about victims getting "closure." It's important to realize that for many, achieving closure is impossible.

In those first weeks after the attacks, reporters and anchors showed more humanity than ever before. The tragedy allowed a brief window to be opened, offering a view of human beings not afraid to wear their hearts on their sleeves.

We haven't seen that since. We've gone back to the jaded attitude, the tired concept of "if it bleeds, it leads."

Perhaps if we all pick one soul to remember today, we can remember that as news people it's acceptable to be human.

-

Friday, September 10, 2010

Memo to General Managers: the most important asset of any television station is its staff

A while back I was talking to a new client who told me I could watch some of her stories on the station's website. Upon visiting said website, I started looking for the news staff bios, to learn a little more about the person I was talking to and see the face that went with the voice.

"I can't find you," I said.

"Oh, our station doesn't put our pictures or bios on the website."

Huh? If ever the cluegun needed to be fired, this was the time.

Since that call I've noted more than a few stations have this policy. Apparently this conversation goes on between general managers and webmasters when launching a website:


Webmaster: "I'll need photos of all the on air staff for the bios."

GM: "Ah, but we're not going to put those on the website. I want no information about our people anywhere! Nothing!"

Webmaster: "But viewers want to get to know the people they watch--"

GM: "Then keep 'em guessing! No photos, no bios, nothing! Hey, they'll spend lots of time looking for the on-air staff and that will give us more page views! Maybe you could create some sort of infinite search loop so that they think they're getting close to finding what they want!"


We've heard about "branding" for years now, and it's time some managers realized that people are the brand. Sure, you may have catchy slogans and a slick logo, but the main reason viewers tune in to watch a newscast is because they like and trust the people on it. Hello, McFly! Your anchors and reporters are the "face" of your station, whether you beancounters want to admit it or not.

On the other side of the coin are the stations who have bios on the behind-the-scenes people; the photogs, producers, and all members of the news staff. That's not only cool, it builds morale. It tells those who are not on camera that they're just as important as those in front of it.

Not putting your people on the website is like a restaurant running a TV ad without showing the food.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Stats that blew my mind

Hard to believe this blog has been around almost three years. I've often wondered about the people who read it; especially those who send in anonymous questions.

Who are these guys?

Last week I noticed the blogging service had added a button to my account called "stats." Now there was already a thing that told me how many people visited the site without getting a RSS feed (whatever that is) so I had a ballpark idea of the size of the audience.

What I didn't know was where the audience was.

But now the "stats" page told me.

I figured 99 percent of visitors were from the United States. Wow, was I ever wrong.

Check out a list of other countries that house visitors to this blog:

Canada
United Kingdom

Okay, that's not far fetched. I've had a few emails from people in those countries. Here's what really surprised me:

Israel
Australia
Russia
Algeria
Spain
Hong Kong
Burundi (full disclosure: I had to break out the atlas)
South Korea
Latvia
Sweden
Taiwan
Ukraine

Are you kidding me? Is there some producer out there using some tricks while putting together Latvia Tonight? Might there be a reporter who is using more nat sound while putting together packages for the Swedish version of Nightline? Or are the underpaid reporters in this country taking exotic vacations and logging in from the Outback?

Well, whoever you are, I want to hear from you. Seriously, if you're reading this outside the US, drop me a line at tvnewsgrapevine@gmail.com and let me know a little about you and what you're doing in the TV industry.


--

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Agent qualifications

Grape,

Quick question. Do agents need a license to do what they do? And are they required to go through any sort of training before becoming an agent?


No. And no.

Anyone can call himself an agent. No rules, no degrees, no training required. You don't even need experience in the industry. If you want to be an agent, poof, you're an agent. There is no regulatory agency. While organizations like the NFL require agents to be registered with the league and meet certain specifications, television news has no such rules.

That said, most agents have experience in the industry. Some are former reporters, News Directors, producers, etc. Others worked as assistants to veteran agents.

You have to keep a few things in mind when considering an agent. There are very good agents and very bad agents. And getting an agent is no guarantee of getting a job. Even the best agent cannot wave a magic wand and create a job for you.

Many young people are lured by the prospect of getting an agent. It's impressive to say, "I have an agent," but it doesn't mean anything if you have a bad one. And just because an agent contacts you, that doesn't mean you're talented or ready to move up. Some agencies sign everyone in the hopes of getting a commission by using the "volume, volume, volume" approach. When you've got a kazillion clients, some of them will find jobs and you'll get a commission.

Another thing that clouds the issue is the "moving on" section of websites like tvjobs.com. It seems that every single person has an agent. But people who get jobs on their own don't bother sending notices about their career moves. And there are a lot more people without agents than people who have them.

Remember, a good agent knows your talent and your goals. He'll send your tapes to stations at which you might be a good match. He doesn't send your tapes to Minneapolis if he knows you hate the cold. He doesn't send your tapes for morning show openings if he knows you have no desire to work that shift. He returns your calls or emails promptly and is realistic about your chances. Hopefully he has contacts that can open a few doors that might otherwise be closed.

A bad agent puts your tape in a box with every other client in the hopes the ND will pick someone and create a commission.

Be very careful when choosing an agent. Do your homework, talk to other clients, and even ask your former News Directors.

Signing with the wrong agent can be devastating to your career.

Monday, September 6, 2010

Quick tip

Okay, I've now received three DVDs in a row that won't play in my computer. I got one to play in my living room and two on my old portable DVD player.

When sending out DVDs, it's a good idea to check them on a few different computers or DVD players to make sure they'll play. A News Director doesn't have time to do what I do for clients, so make doubly sure your DVDs play easily.

There's no industry standard for DVD burners, so the chances for problems are a lot greater than with old fashioned VHS tapes.